Спостереження за морфонологічними функціями наголосу в ад’єктонімному словотворі
Ескіз недоступний
Дата
2019
Назва журналу
Номер ISSN
Назва тому
Видавець
КОД
Анотація
(uk) У пропонованій статті досліджуються морфонологічні функції наголосу в ад’єктонімному словотворі. Підкреслюється, що при всій своїй специфічності система наголошення українських ад’єктонімів підпорядковується основним акцентуаційним законам української мови. Встановлюються типи акцентних опозицій в ад’єктонімному словотворі, досліджуються групи ад’єктонімних суфіксів залежно від акцентованості чи неакцентованості, аналізуються морфонологічні функції наголосу. Констатується, що домінуючим є процес збереження наголосу твірного слова.
(en) The proposed article explores the morphological functions of stress in adjectival word-formation. It is emphasized that with all its specificity the system of the accent of Ukrainian adjectonim is subject to the main accentuation laws of Ukrainian language. It has been established that stress is the most important means by which a word is formed. Morphological accent origins consists in morphological derivativeness which is displayed in that derivative either preserves the base of producing word and him accentuation, or transforms them for some standard rules. Five types of accent oppositions in adjectonim word-formation are distinguished: 1) accent on the basis of oikonim-accent on the basis of adjectonim; 2) accent on the basis of oikonim-accent on producing suffix adjectonim; 3) accent on the basis of oikonim- accent on inflection adlactone; 4) accent on inflection oikonim- accent on the basis of adjectonim; 5) accent on inflection oikonim- accent on inflection adjectonim. According to the stressness or non-stressness four groups of adjectonim suffixes are define: 1) suffixes that do not bear the stress; 2) suffixes that appear under the stress; 3) suffixes, which in some cases act as stress, and in others -unstressed; 4) the suffixes which mainly act by unstressed. Such morphological functionof stress в adjectonim word-formation were revealed 1) preservation accentuation producing word in derivative; 2) moving of the accent which leads to change-over of accent model of derivative wordas compared with producing; 3) alignment of accent term derivative with common language tendency to the accent the middle of the word; 4) continuation and completion after shock base of descending part of intonation; 5) he preservation of the place and method of stress produced in the derivative; 6) filling up of stress element. It is proven that in accentuation toponyms adjectives of the most strong there is action tendency to preservation of the accent of producing word. (dominant is the process of preserving the stress of the producing word).
(en) The proposed article explores the morphological functions of stress in adjectival word-formation. It is emphasized that with all its specificity the system of the accent of Ukrainian adjectonim is subject to the main accentuation laws of Ukrainian language. It has been established that stress is the most important means by which a word is formed. Morphological accent origins consists in morphological derivativeness which is displayed in that derivative either preserves the base of producing word and him accentuation, or transforms them for some standard rules. Five types of accent oppositions in adjectonim word-formation are distinguished: 1) accent on the basis of oikonim-accent on the basis of adjectonim; 2) accent on the basis of oikonim-accent on producing suffix adjectonim; 3) accent on the basis of oikonim- accent on inflection adlactone; 4) accent on inflection oikonim- accent on the basis of adjectonim; 5) accent on inflection oikonim- accent on inflection adjectonim. According to the stressness or non-stressness four groups of adjectonim suffixes are define: 1) suffixes that do not bear the stress; 2) suffixes that appear under the stress; 3) suffixes, which in some cases act as stress, and in others -unstressed; 4) the suffixes which mainly act by unstressed. Such morphological functionof stress в adjectonim word-formation were revealed 1) preservation accentuation producing word in derivative; 2) moving of the accent which leads to change-over of accent model of derivative wordas compared with producing; 3) alignment of accent term derivative with common language tendency to the accent the middle of the word; 4) continuation and completion after shock base of descending part of intonation; 5) he preservation of the place and method of stress produced in the derivative; 6) filling up of stress element. It is proven that in accentuation toponyms adjectives of the most strong there is action tendency to preservation of the accent of producing word. (dominant is the process of preserving the stress of the producing word).
Опис
Ключові слова
ад’єктоніми, система наголошення ад’єктонімів, ад’єктонімний словотвір, акцентуаційні закони, типи акцентних опозицій, морфонологічні функції наголосу, акцентно-інтонаційна структура, ад’єктонімні суфікси, морфонологічна похідність, adjectonim, the system of the stress adjectonim, adlactone word-formation, accentological laws, types of accent oppositions, morphological functions of the stress, accent-intonational structure, adlactone suffixes, morphological derivativeness
Бібліографічний опис
Гуцул Л. І. Спостереження за морфонологічними функціями наголосу в ад’єктонімному словотворі / Лариса Іванівна Гуцул // Наукові записки ЦДПУ. Серія: Філологічні науки = Research Bulletin. Series: Philological Sciences / ред. кол.: О. А. Семенюк [та ін.]. – Кропивницький : КОД, 2019. – Вип. 175. – С. 173-178.