Перегляд {{ collection }} за Автор "Kyryliuk, Olga"

Зараз показуємо 1 - 2 з 2

Fabricated frames as a way of erasing historical memory (based on the discourse of Russia’s aggression against Ukraine
(2021) Кирилюк, Ольга Леонідівна; Kyryliuk, Olga
(en) This paper views the peculiarities of the use of language units as a means of waging the information aggression of Russia against Ukraine. It has been established that the use of some and, conversely, the displacement of other nouns from the social discourse can destroy established frame structures, impose false concepts that radically change the language picture of the recipient's world. The study is based on the concept of a "fabricated frame" as a way of misinterpreting events. Thus, for many years, Russian propaganda, using a well -established set of language units, has been trying to establish a false verbalization of traditional Ukrainian concepts. T his causes the erasure of Ukrainian national and historical memory. The destructive influence is carried out through all possible channels of communication (mass media, social networks, books, movies, etc.). The following main ways of destroying the frame structure are identified: 1) replacement of key lexemes in the message (the term "борець за незалежність (fighter for independence)” is replaced by “бандит (bandit)” or “фашист (fascist)”); 2) removing lexemes from public space (for example, a ban on the use of the term “український народ (Ukrainian people)”); 3) introduction into a negative context (in particular, images of Ukrainian national heroes (including writers and scientists) with the help of words with negative, often derogatory semantics), etc. Therefore, countries that are in the potential zone of the Kremlin’s interest should timely recognize the cases of language aggression in public discourse to develop an effective system of countermeasures.
Linguistic accompaniment of information warfare (based on the Russian-Ukrainian armed conflict)
(2020) Кирилюк, Ольга Леонідівна; Kyryliuk, Olga
(en) Language is an important means of waging an information war. The study of linguistic units, through which each of the parties to the armed conflict affects the recipients, makes it possible to model a fragment of the language picture of the world of society forced to live in war. Often this picture is formed under the influence of the mass media and social networks. In this paper, the associative-semantic field “enemy” in the context of the Russian-Ukrainian armed confrontation is structured on the basis of the language units used by Ukrainian information resources. Particular attention is paid to the peculiarities of the associative-semantic group (ASG) “enemy media”, which include three microgroups (ASmG) with core lexemes “mass media”, “journalists”, “phenomena”. The constituents of ASmG “mass media” are divided into semantic rows: associations that reveal the Russian affiliation of information resources (Russia- media, Putin-TV); lexemes that indicate the propagandistic nature of the media (information Spetsnaz); lexemes to denote the harmfulness of actions (to sow confusion, to lie through one’s teeth). The components of ASmG “journalists” are lexemes that indicate the privilege of individual employees of the media industry (generals of information troops) and their financial interest (millionaires from TV). ASmG “phenomena” combines terms formed from the names of famous journalists (Kyselov – kyselovshchyna, Skabeieva – skabeievshchyna), as well as phraseological units that appeared as a result of the Russian media spreading false or manipulative information (crucified boy, into radioactive ash).